Mystery, Unidentified,
Undisclosed & blind tasted
|
|
|
Why
the mystery?
On this
page I will address a few drams which I cannot identify by
distillery, whether because of labelling which doesn't clearly
identify them, or perhaps they are bottlings from undisclosed
distilleries, or even in some cases because they were given to me
blind and I am awaiting to hear how good my analysis and
guesswork were.
Also
included here are a few which may be named, but just don't fit
on other pages.
|
|
|
|
|
Adelphi, "Breath of Islay",
12y, 1999-2001
56.1%
Cask
No.5877, one of 329 bottles
Original cost of this bottle:
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Gentle amber
Nose:
Aged oak infused with Atlantic freshness as woody sea-air is
combined with a peaty beach bonfire. Some slight rubberiness
hints at a sherry influence.
Palate: More peat
presence here than on the nose, plus more Atlantic sea-air. Then
come dark fruits including plums, raisins, currants and cherries
followed by a damp woodiness, reminiscent of submerged pier
supports.
Finish. Long and rich with some peat
too.
Overall impression:
Excellent. A wonderful example of Islay at its near best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD Rattray, "Cask Islay",
46%
Small
Batch Vatting #1
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Water? Almost
Nose:
Peaty, fruity, rubbery. Yes definite peat with light rubberiness
and background fruit. With time it just expands as more of the
same.
Palate: Slightly
thin, but lots of what the nose promised.
Finish. Medium to long
Overall impression: A
good and innocuous light Islay whisky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "Smoking Islay",
11y, 12.4.2000 - Aug. 2011,
59.4%
Cask
Ref. BA2011/429, bottle No.264 of 278
Original
cost of this bottle:
to
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Light bronze - rich gold
Nose:
Oaky malt with a gentle and slow developing light smokiness.
Raisins and lightly smoked cheese develop with further time.
Palate: Creamy
furniture polish, sweet redcurrant and gradually developing
smokiness, but more wood than peat smoke.
Finish. Long
Overall impression: A
very good whisky. Most enjoyable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "Smoking Islay",
bottled 06.2012, 62%
Cask
Ref. BA2012/436, bottle No.281
of 287
Original
cost of this bottle:
to
Reviewed blind as part of MMA 2012
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Chablis white wine
Nose:
Initially intensely tingly on the nose thanks to the high abv.
Then comes a sweet light earthiness which is almost rubbery -
but not quite. Am I reminded of an Atlantic fishing harbour? In
a way yes as this is quite maritime, but not fishy.
Palate: A very
pleasant mix of peatiness and maritime-ness, fishing harbour
indeed. Very nicely warming too.
Finish. Long and warming.
Overall impression: Mmmm
liquid comfort food with peaty overtones. Does it need a little
water? Maybe next time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "Smoking Islay",
bottled 07.2012, 55%
Cask
Ref. BA2012/438, bottle No.132
of 240
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed blind as part of MMA 2012
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Extremely pale, almost water-like
Nose:
Light fishy smokiness alongside distinct peatiness. Over some
minutes in the glass a light rubberiness takes over from the
fishiness.
Palate: Yes, a
light rubberiness here alongside a fruitiness reminiscent of
peach and galia melon. Nice.
Finish. Long with that peachy
peatiness.
Overall impression: Very
nice fruity peatiness. Light but yet solid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "Peat Reek",
13y, bottled 06.2012, 61.5%
Cask
Ref. 2012/1, bottle No.244
of 268
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed blind as part of MMA 2012
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Very pale yellow
Nose:
Fresh antiseptic peatiness. The peatiness is really quite light
and after a few minutes in the glass it develops a fresh
woodiness. I love that antiseptic quality which reminds me of a
(UK) skin product called Germolene. After more time is that a
light fruitiness coming to the fore? Aye, very nice.
Palate: Much
bigger and more intense than the nose with a massive fruity
tingle on the front of the palate and a solid earthiness at the
back. This is possibly more earthy than peaty, but I really like
it.
Finish. Long and intense.
Overall impression: A
gentle and quite sophisticated nose just explodes onto the
palate. Surprisingly big and intense. Very nice indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "A drop of the Irish",
NAS, bottled Feb. 2011, 46%
Cask
Ref.
343, bottle No.21 of 314
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Extremely pale
Nose:
Fruit, big fruit with lime and clementine, including the zest.
Eventually a creamy leafiness attempts to come through, but the
clementine holds it back.
Palate: An
initially creamy mouth-feel holds lots of that clementine, but
the leafiness now does manage to appear alongside some lime and
faint coconut.
Finish. Long. citrus, repeating
Overall impression: Nice,
a pleasant surprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder, "A drop of the Irish",
14y, 31.10.1996 - Feb. 2011, 58.2%
Cask
Ref.
253, bottle No.88 of 261
Original
cost of this bottle:
to
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Hay left in the sun
Nose:
Lightly floral with hints of coconut at the beginning. This
expands wit htime into very floral coconut with hints of
butterscotch.
Palate: Initially
quite imposing, very floral, almost perfumed, coconut macaroon.
Then come hints of cranberry and a lightly toasted character
towards the end.
Finish. Long and slightly toasted
Overall impression:
Excellent, I really like this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Taylor, "Auld Reekie",
10y, 46%
Original
cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale yellow gold
Nose:
There's an immediate lightly fruity rubberiness with
accompanying vanilla. Then come some citrus (lemon zest) hints
followed again by a suggestion of a beach bonfire with smoky Atlantic driftwood.
Palate: Nice and
gentle but still suggesting coastal Islay. It also has a creamy
mouth-feel whilst remaining quite gentle or subdued. There's a
fruitiness which reminds me of pear, green apple and water melon,
perhaps as a fruit cocktail enjoyed on an Islay beach next to a
peat bog.
Finish. Long and gentle.
Overall impression: I do
like this fruity, peaty gentleness. Awfully civilised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Taylor, "Big Smoke 60",
60%
Original
cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Very pale yellow gold
Nose:
Fruity outdoor swimming pool. Ahh yes, lots of fruitiness
reminiscent of redcurrants, raspberry and maybe even a hint of
strawberry, certainly red fruit. Red apple skin too maybe? It's
also very fresh and light, hence my outdoor swimming pool
comment. There's also a musty or dusty oakiness which, with time
in the glass begins to develop a peaty smokiness which expands
further as the fruitiness fades.
Palate: Quite 'big'
indeed on the palate with a really quite intensely fruity
peatiness. The fruitiness is now more like peach, kiwi, kumquat
and galia melon, a very nice cocktail with gentile
sophistication. Although this is 60% abv I just didn't wish to
add water, it's just fine as it comes.
Finish. Long and mildly fruity with
that smokiness.
Overall impression: A
true gentle giant. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finlaggan,
Cask
Strength,
58%
Original
cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Bright golden with a faint orange tinge
Nose:
Smoky and musty but with a distinct citrus fruitiness.
Palate: Smoky,
sweet and fruity in a very mouth-coating way.
5
Drops of water: The nose is still smoky and fruity but much
less citrus now. The palate is also still smoky but now has a
grassiness and is considerably less fruity.
5
More drops of water: The nose is now musty and gently smoky
but all very subdued. The palate is again much less fruity and
exhibits a lovely gentle smokiness.
Finish. Very long.
Overall impression: This
one really needs water and plenty of it to bring the best out. I
loved the smoky but gentle character after the 10 drops. Very
nice whisky at a fantastic price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MacPhail's Royal Wedding,
Released July 1986, 40%
A
special vatting of whisky distilled in 1959 & 1960
Original
cost of this bottle: Unknown, now a collectible
Live
Dram-atics review
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Rich and luscious dark teak
Nose:
Initially filled
with raisins, plums, currants and prunes (heavy on the prunes),
all marinated in a rich cherry sauce. Amongst all these,
something really quite aromatic but much lighter along the lines
of very floral almond tries to come through too.
Palate:
Very
rich and lightly toasted in flavour with those suggestions of prunes, raisins and cherries, but it
has a surprisingly sligthly watery mouth-feel.
Finish. Long, creamy and rich
Overall impression:
A very
rich sherry cask whisky, but it's just slightly let down by that
wateriness on the palate, although it's still very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ichiro
I was
given this sample by a good whisky friend a few years ago and
sadly I've misplaced any further information about the bottle.
This means I have no idea what type of whisky it is (blend,
single malt ..?) so hence it is listed in this 'Mystery' section
of my website.
Original
cost of this bottle: Unknown
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Bright golden yellow
Nose:
Very intense with a distinct freshness which is almost minty,
prehaps spearmint as opposed to peppermint. This freshness is
expanded after a few minutes to include a herbal element quite
similar to Eucalyptus oil poured over coals in a sauna.
Palate: Like the
nose the palate is also fresh with herbal elements but has lots
of peppery tingle thanks to high abv? In addition it has a quite
meaty quality which makes me think of a Sunday roast of pork,
beef or lamb. I think I'll settle for herb crusted roast lamb.
Finish. Very long, peppery and meaty.
Overall impression: Big,
fresh, meaty and very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Islay Mist,
40%
"The
unique blend of Scotch Whisky"
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Golden yellow
Nose:
Very fruity suggestions of peach and vanilla (ice cream) over a
mildly smoky background.
Palate: Creamy
mouth-feel and very fruity with peach, apricot?, papaya .. just
like a fruit cocktail with lashings of fresh cream. Yes, it's
mildly smoky too.
Finish. Long, soothing and fruity.
Overall impression:
Wonderfully fruity with gentle smokiness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Islay Mist,
40%
"The
original peated blend' (2021 edition)
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Shiny golden oak
Nose:
Gently smoky but a little musty with some dry woodiness. Maybe
even a hint of banana skin and smoky Black Forest ham but it's
all very mild.
Palate: There's a
watery mouth-feel (40%) but it has a good character with fruity
smoky peatiness where the fruitiness is reminiscent of summer
berries.
Finish. Long, smoky, peaty & fruity.
Overall impression:
Maybe not stunning but at a price of 19 it's fantastic value
for money and really quite enjoyable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Sheep Dip 1990",
40%
A
vatting or blend of Ardbeg, Dalmore & Fettercairn
Original
cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Oak with a coppery bronze hue
Nose:
Initially an interesting cocktail of fruit, malt and light
smoke. As this settles with some minutes in the glass the fruity
smoke increases and includes more earthiness (peat) and some
light rubber notes. Imagine red berries and bramble served on a
rubber plate with a light peat sauce.
Palate: Slightly
peppery fruit on the front of the palate with a dry, faint
smokiness on the back. Unliek the red berries of the nose, the
palate offers mostly peach and apricot with a suggestion of
mango.
Finish. Very long, fruity, dry and
slightly smoky.
Overall impression: A
very interesting nose with an equally interesting, if not quite
so good, palate.
|
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale yellow
Nose:
The
nose initially oozes with Atlantic freshness, sea-salt and a
hint of gentle smoke which soon expands to a full-blown peat
bog, but given more time (4-5 minutes) I'm astonished as a vivid
fruitiness including red berries, redcurrants and pears rise
from those peaty embers.
Palate:
The
fruit leads, followed by the peat which expands further over the
palate with time.
With 4 drops of water the nose
is a little subdued, more aromatic as opposed to full-on peat
bog. The palate is smoother with lingering peat alongside
raspberry.
A further 4
drops of water increase the fruit again, although it is now
somewhat weaker in overall intensity. The palate is now
reminiscent of gentle bonfire embers on an Atlantic beach. I
love the fruitiness of this whisky, especially alongside the
obvious peat and Atlantic freshness.
Finish. Long, very long, with fruit
and peat, albeit slightly dry.
Overall impression:
This
Port Askaig Harbour is truly magnificent.
Today has been very much about fruit and complex but subtle
flavours. This Port Askaig has all the peat of a traditional
Islay heavyweight, whilst at the same time offering surprising
amounts of fruit. Those rebcurrants and red berries are
fantastic alongside a healthy dose of peat and Atlantic
freshness. But can I classify this whisky as one of my 'Greats'
by awarding a 90 point score? Yes!
|
|
|
|
Unidentified
Speyside Bottlings |
|
|
|
|
|
Whisky Agency,
Speyside Region,
40y,
55%
Distilled 1975, bottled 2016
Sherry
Butt, one of 389 bottles
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale amber with a coppery tinge
Nose:
Very aromatic with a distinct aroma of aniseed and a suggestion
of dentist's surgery. After 4-5 minutes in the glass these
aromas fade to be replaced by marzipan and a hint of fruity red
wine.
Palate: Very
smooth and creamy mouth-feel whilst being rich and mouth-coating
with suggestions of marzipan, cardamom seed and metaxa.
Finish. Long
Overall impression: A
whisky of two distinct halves with a very fresh nose and a rich
intense palate. Very nice despite the dentist's surgery.
I'm
revisiting this whisky in the Spring of 2021 as I come across my
very last sample:
My
Glass is once again my trusted Classic Malt and The
Colour seems to have lost its coppery tinge as it's now a
light yellow golden colour.
The
Nose remains similar to my previous review with lots of
freshness and a hint of aniseed although I no longer detect the
suggestions of marzipan and fruity red wine.
The
Palate is fresh and intense with a mouth-coating pepperiness
and a suggestion of marzipan nuttiness.
The
Finish is very long.
My
Overall Impression is quite similar to my original one but
with some differences in the whisky's characteristics. Very,
very good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chieftain's, Speyside,
Vintage
1973, 41y,
57.4%
Distilled Dec.1973, bottled Nov.2015
Sherry
Butt, Cask 7992, one of 369 bottles
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark amber, perhaps treacle toffee with a
hint of copper.
Nose:
Rich and intense but also aromatically floral with suggestions
of marzipan, dark fruits and nuts.
Palate: Amazing,
here's a flashback to one of my guilty pleasures back in the UK
(McVities) Jamaica ginger cake! Massive flavour of ginger
(cake) but without the burn of ginger. There's also lots of
fruitiness and nuttiness making this a rich, deep, luxurious
delight.
Finish. Long with lots of
ginger-iness.
Overall impression:
Delightfully rich with a great depth of flavour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chieftain's, Speyside,
Vintage
1995, 20y,
53.6%
Distilled April 1995, bottled Nov.2015
Sherry
Butt, Cask 1378, one of 645 bottles
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark with a coppery tinge
Nose:
Old matured woodiness with suggestions of marzipan and a vanilla
creaminess, perhaps custard.
Palate: The
creaminess from the nose carries directly onto the palate
alongside a spicy tingle. I'm now thinking cheesecake but with
some dark fruitiness, perhaps bramble or plum?
Finish. Very long concentrated mainly
on the back of the palate.
Overall impression: I
really enjoyed this whisky and contrary to how it looks it isn't
overly sherried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speyside,
Blended
Malt, bottled 2016,
45.6%
BBR
exclusive for Taiwan, Hot Malt Co.
Blue
Hangar 13th Limited Release
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Oak, dark pine
Nose:
Initial suggestions of mustiness with a toasted woodiness
alongside a mild smoky fishiness.
Palate: It's
mouth-coating and sweet with flavours of summer berries, perhaps
blackberry or bramble jam or jelly. Maybe even a hint of
blackcurrant or red currant.
Finish. Long and fruity.
Overall impression:
Lovely fruity whisky. Ideal for a summer evening on the patio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speyside, Distilled 12.1973, bottled 01.2014,
54.4%
Scottish
Independent Dist. Co. Ltd
GI Jane
House Co. Ltd (Taiwan)
Sherry
Butt, Cask 7989, bottle 149 of 249
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark amber
Nose:
Sweet notes of furniture polish, chocolate, coconut (perhaps
chocolate macaroon?) and mild coffee.
Palate: Big with
flavours of chocolate & coconut, coffee beans and even a mild
suggestion of orange.
Finish. Very long with that chocolate
and orange reminding me of Terry's chocolate orange back in the
UK.
Overall impression:
Classic rich sherry cask whisky, I just love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maltbarn,
Speyside, 45y, 53.2%ABV
Distilled 1973, bottled 2018
Sherry
Cask, bottle No.93 of 299
Original
cost of this bottle: Unknown
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale yellow gold
Nose:
Very aromatic, sweet and flowery, furniture polish, candy floss
and a very faint rubberiness.
Palate: Even more
flowery than the nose, it's almost (beautifully) perfumed, it's
sweet and delicate but with a mouth-tingle ... abv?
Finish. Very long and flowery but
gentle.
Overall impression:
Delightful, I love it. If I had a larger sample I could have
added water which I think would have made it even better,
perhaps lifting it to "Great"ness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wemyss, "Peat Chimney",
12y, 40%
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Rich gold
Nose:
Aged wood, perhaps Atlantic jetty thanks to a maritime character.
Then blackcurrants and cherries served in an aged oak cask with
light vanilla sauce. An underlying (wood) smokiness.
Palate: Vanilla
ice cream, apricot, blackberry and a degree of smokiness.
Finish. Medium, expanding to long.
Overall impression: A
very good fruity and (lightly) smoky whisky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wemyss, "Whispering Smoke",
1981 - 2011, 46%
One of
228 bottles
Original
cost of this bottle:
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale yellow gold, straw
Nose:
Very aromatic and fresh with new Italian soft leather expanding
more with time. After 4-5 minutes some slightly antiseptic hints
develop, almost minty.
Palate: Everything
the nose promised. Very fresh, slightly leafy, fruity and
lightly smoked.
Finish. Very long and fresh
Overall impression:
Excellent, very enjoyable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wemyss, "Vanilla Summer",
1997 - 2011, 46%
One of 363 bottles
Original
cost of this bottle:
to
Reviewed
as part of MMA 2011
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Yellow (21ct) gold
Nose:
Quite floral with an initial burst of
rose water fading to leave malty vanilla. Slight fruitiness too
(apple, pear? - but quite ripe).
Palate: Vanilla
explosion accompanied by slight pepperiness, but the pepperiness
sonn fades to be replaced by traces of red berries.
Finish. Medium, fading quite quickly
Overall impression:
Another very good and thoroughly enjoyable whisky from Wemyss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whiskies of
Scotland,
"Vatted Malt Scotch Whisky", 20y,
47.4%
A rare
blend of single malts from closed distilleries (Mosstowie, Glen
Mhor, Banff, Glencraig)
Original
cost of this bottle:
Unknown
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale yellow gold
Nose:
Malt and oats alongside perfumed wood, then light butterscotch
with hints of popcorn and a suggestion of slightly bitter fruit.
Palate: Silky
smooth mouth-feel and initially uite fruity with peach and ripe
pear. This is followed by malty butterscotch and some ginger
notes. There's also some of that perfumed wood from the nose
which now reminds me of sandalwood.
Finish. Long and aromatically fruity
with hints of freshly cut wood.
Overall impression: A
quite unusual but very good vatted malt. I love it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilson & Morgan,
"House Malt - Islay", 25y,
54.2%
Half of
Butt #55, bottle No.283 of 284
Original cost of this bottle:
|
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour:
It's dark, treacle toffee maybe even
creosote.
Nose:
First impressions are of a rich sherried cask, then bonfire
embers give a gentle smokiness, perhaps a toasted character.
Fruitiness comes via suggestions of prunes and currants.
Palate: Again rich
with a suggestion of toasted dark fruits now including banana.
The gentle smokiness (wood smoke) carries through from the nose.
Finish. Long and rich.
Overall impression: A
quite stunning whisky. A delightful "Great"!
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Clansman,
'Keith'
40% ABV
Label states; "A
single malt Scotch whisky"
You know the kind
of thing, available with most common names and bought from
numerous gift shops across Scotland. In this case, a gift from a
relative after such a trip to Scotland. I expect not 'Glen
Keith' distillery.
|
|
|
Nose: Initially very
malty, but this soon made way for leather
Palate: Smooth and
very gentle with a suggestion of what in Germany is known as
vanilla pudding. In England we would say 'Angel Delight'. The
finish is quite long even though the flavours are light. The
aftertaste is slightly bitter.
With
3 drops of water: Sorry, almost ruined with not much left at
all, but the finish is longer.
Overall impression: A
light and inoffensive dram, but if I'm honest, also with not
much to offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Stirk,
"Isle of Islay", 1990, 20y, 52.8%
"Exclusive
Malts" range, cask 251211, one of 298 bottles
Original
cost of this bottle:
Unknown
Live
(and blind) Dram-atics Review |
|
|
Glass: Classic Malt
Colour: Treacle toffee,
almost teak.
Nose:
Oak, dark fruits (plums, raisins, currants and figs), then a
hint of toasted vanilla.
Palate: Very rich
and creamy oak, dark fruits and a hint of very dark (90% +)
chocolate.
With
4 drops of water:
More wood on the nose, but a slightly sweeter palate with more
fruit and some nuts.
Finish. Very long with aged oak and fruit,
even longer with water.
Overall impression:
Thoroughly enjoyable!
|
|
|
|
Dotty Scottie |
Oliver Klimek's
blind competition of Scotch Whisky, 2012 |
|
|
|
Along
with a few other rather optimistic volunteers I agreed to take
part in Oliver Klimek's blind tasting competition and try to
guess the attributes of five whiskies only identifiable by
coloured dots. The only information we were given was that they
were all single malts from Scotland, OB with age statements or
year of distillation. Our task was to guess distillery,
expression, age and abv for each. |
|
|
|
|
Green Dot; Caol
Ila Unpeated, 12y,
57.6% ABV
2010 Edition
|
|
|
First tasting
Nose;
Woody vanilla
and slightly bitter fruit star fruit. Also apple and a slight
grassiness.
Very aromatically so.
Palate;
Very fruity
with some light pepperiness.
Finish;
Long & tingly.
Second tasting
Nose;
Very fruity,
slightly bitter. I stick with apple, star fruit, pear and maybe
a hint
of peach.
Palate;
Fruit, light
grassiness, rich and smooth.
Finish;
Long, very
long, fruity, creamy & silky.
Thinking out loud;
Initially I
suggested this could be any from Balblair, An Cnoc, Cragganmore,
Glen Garioch, Scapa, Strathisla, Tullibardine or even HP.
On this second tasting Im really going out on a limb here as I
concentrate on the fruitiness which really is typical of
Balblair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yellow
Dot;
Loch Lomond, 1966-2011,
40% ABV
Distilled in the
distillery's first year of operation.
|
|
|
First tasting
Nose;
Creamy fruit,
malt, popcorn, floral wood, very slightly leafy.
Palate;
Creamy fruit &
vanilla, lots of vanilla.
Finish;
Long with vanilla. Did I mention vanilla?
Second tasting
Nose;
Lots of light
flora, vanilla and wood. Even just a smattering of light
furniture
polish. Drying
paint and furniture polish intensifies with time.
Palate;
Fruit banana
stem but light or faint. Pear? Peach? Slightly watery?
Finish;
Long, fruity
watery.
Thinking out loud;
Initially I
suggested this could be from Scapa, Scapa or Scapa. But there
must be other possibilities? Give me a little time
No, Im
coming away from Scapa, dont know why, but I am. Slightly
watery? 40%. Bloody ell, Im sure Ive had this before, or
something very similar, but what the hell is it? Strathisla?
Jura, maybe, but not quite methinks
..
Nah, soddit, I have to stick with Scapa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue
Dot;
Benrinnes,
23y,
58.8% ABV
Bottled for Friends
of Classic Malts
|
|
|
First tasting
Nose;
Fresh wood,
currants, raisins. Touches of leather. My good old English
country
house study or
library. Very rich, also quite fresh.
Palate;
Creamy smooth
dark fruits, coffee and chocolate.
Finish;
Smooth and creamy, some light pepperiness. Some floral elements
very late.
Second tasting
Nose;
Lots of dark
fruits and sherried attributes. Light leatheriness, a little
musty?
Palate;
Creamy, lightly
peppery, slightly sweet.. Honey, peppery, spicy, chocolate,
coffee.
Finish;
Very long &
smooth spices.
Thinking out loud;
Initially I
suggested this could be any of the standard sherried suspects;
Glenfarclas, Macduff, Glendronach, Aberlour or Dalmore.
On this second tasting
Im really going out on a limb here as I think the abv is quite
high and just doesnt fit any of my first thoughts, unless an
ABunadh or similar
So, Im saying:
Springbank
Rundlets &
Kinderkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red
Dot;
Glenfarclas,
1993,
46% ABV
Premium edition,
Oloroso sherry casks
|
|
|
First tasting
Nose;
Very creamy and
lightly perfumed, vanilla and peach ice cream. Develops
hints of light
woodiness over time in glass.
Palate;
Very smooth,
very creamy, vanilla and peach.
Finish;
Medium to long. Slightly dry & fruity. Actually it really is
quite long.
Second tasting
Nose;
Creamy
fruitiness, light leafiness? Biscuit.
Palate;
Smooth and
creamy, a little bite at the end.
Finish;
Long, and
silky.
Thinking out loud;
Initially I
suggested this could be any from Balblair, Glenmorangie, Arran,
Tomintoul or Glen Garioch.
On this second tasting Im really coming down in
favour of Arran, not sure why but this just shouts Arran at me.
If it wasnt distilled there it should have been
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black Dot;
Auchentoshan,
1999, 11y,
58% ABV
Bordeaux cask
matured
|
|
|
First tasting
Nose;
Very aromatic and lightly floral wood. Some
grassiness too. Almost lightly
sherried but more candy floss than dark
fruits. Vanilla too maybe?
Palate;
Creamy mouth-feel with plums, prunes
and vanilla.
Finish; Very
long, lightly peppery.
Second tasting
Nose;
Aromatic herbs and a faint hint of
hay, but all very floral as opposed to grassy.
Fruity vanilla?
Palate;
Creamy, peppery, fruity. Lots of
tingle. Vanilla, cherries, damson?
Finish;
Very long & tingly.
Thinking out loud;
Initially I suggested this could be
any of Balvenie, Cragganmore, Dalwhinnie, Glenfiddich, Arran,
Springbank, Tullibardine or Longmorn. On my second tasting I am
discounting Arran, Scapa and Tullibardine. On my second tasting
Longmorn comes to mind, but the 16y is only 40% and I think this
one is quite a bit higher.
Somehow I just dont think my first thoughts
fit and Im totally at a loss now, but one distillery remains in
my mind; Balvenie, perhaps one of the single barrels?
|
|
|
|
April 2008 |
Three blind drams |
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown 'Sample 1'
Back in
April 2008 I was given three samples to taste blind.
Unfortunately, the people who brought the samples haven't been
back as yet although I know they are still around Munich so I
hope one day to learn exactly what they were. Anyway, for the
record, here are my notes on the drams and my opinions on
possible origins. |
|
|
Colour: Very pale yellow
Nose: This has quite a
powerful nose for one so pale. Very floral with a slight
background of malt and almost a touch of sea air. At this stage,
my first impression reminds me slightly of Dallas Dhu or perhaps
even an Old Pulteney with the sea air, but OP's are not usually
so strong on the nose. The floral notes are very strong and
intense, almost like a flower bed of Hyacinth perfuming the air
after a day of strong sunshine.
Palate: Wow, strong
stuff, but really quite sweet in the beginning. The sweetness
hits the front of the tongue with an all-out assault and then
fades slowly into hints of liquorice. I seem to recall being
told that these are all CS, which doesn't surprise me by the way
that hit my palate. From the whiskies I have tried before, I
still say Dallas Dhu is the nearest to this one, although in
some ways, similar also to an IB Bladnoch which has some of
these attributes, albeit not so strongly as it isn't CS.
With water: The nose has
lost many of the floral notes in favour of the liquorice. This
is still sweet, but the finish is now much longer and is
remaining on both the immediate front and back of the tongue
with a lingering spiciness.
Verdict: My thoughts of
Old Pulteney have faded, this is too floral and packs too big a
punch for an OP. I have to stand by my idea of Dallas Dhu or
Bladnoch as these are the only two whiskies I am reminded of
when I drink this one. Do I like this one? It is rather
different, very pleasant, but different. Yes, I like it but it
isn't one which I would drink casually, day in, day out. It has
a special taste and I think I would have to be in the mood for
it. I also suspect it would be a great companion to a food dish
in one of my "Gourmet evenings". What would I pair it with?
Probably a spicy starter or a "piquant" main course including
pasta.
|
|
|
Colour: Also very pale,
but slightly brighter yellow than the first one.
Nose: Not so floral,
slightly more medicinal and certainly more acidic on the nose,
or do I mean pungent? Mmmmmm, on the third and fourth nosing I
am getting distinct hints of roasted almonds and it smells very
much like those almond stands in the cold Christmas markets over
here! Once again this nose has a lot of power, but it is more
one-dimensional than the first sample. Which means much less
complex in aromas.
Palate: Sweet (again),
but very rich and extremely smooth. The rich smoothness sits
almost forever on the front of the tongue and doesn't move as
the whisky slides easily down the throat. The hints of nuts (almonds)
are still in evidence on the palate, but there isn't much else
other than the smooth sweetness.
With water: The aroma
has turned more pungent and really attacks the nose. It has also
developed a slight saltiness which wasn't there before. The
palate has totally changed. No longer richly smooth, it now
assaults the tongue with massive spices and salt. This now has
some Old Pulteney attributes, but again I would say it is a
little too powerful for an OP. Bladnoch comes to mind again.
Could this be the 6yr Bourbon matured version? I have one but
haven't tried it yet so I can't say for certain and I'm not
opening it now just to test. Again I do not believe this to be a
Speyside malt. Maybe Lowland or Island, perhaps Highland.
Verdict: Again I like
this and it is a little more of an 'every day' malt than the
first sample. This was delightful with water, but I think I
preferred it even more without. Although the first was better
with 4 drops of water.
|
|
|
Colour: This is the most
colourful of the three, but it is still pale compared to most
whiskies!
Nose: I seem to want to
describe this nose as heavy. Definitely not sweet and with lots
of dough. My goodness, I am back in my Grandma's house when she
is making bread. The dough hasn't yet been put into the oven,
but it has risen and is about to have the tea-towel removed
before placing it into the oven. What a memory. I haven't
thought of this scene for some 35-40 years, but this dram just
brought it straight back to me.
Palate: This one leaves
the front of the tongue alone in favour of the middle to back.
Yes, it has some dough, it also has something herbal which I
can't quite identify, alongside a little Juniper. The juniper
reminds me of Penderyn, but this one isn't quite so distinct as
my previous Penderyn experience. Although I wouldn't be too
surprised if this were a slightly older, sherry-cask Penderyn.
With water: This is much
more lively with water. Much more spicy, but less distinct in
flavour. The finish is now much longer and includes the front of
the tongue. I definitely prefer this one without the water. But
that's just my palate and preference.
A summary
of this mysterious Head to Head;
|
|
|
My favourite is the second, but then I find it hard to
choose between the first and third. The only thing I can think
of for the third is possibly a sherry cask Penderyn, whereas the
first two could be any one of a few different things. As for
ages, I get the impression that the second is the oldest and the
first the youngest. Whereas I feel the third is a sherry cask, I
have the impression that the first two are bourbon casks. But
then what do I know, I am probably way off the mark here.
When I am finally told what these are, I will report back and
let you all have a giggle at how wrong I probably am.
If
any of the three kind people who gave me these are reading this
and laughing at my innacuracy, please do contact me and put me
out of my misery and ineptitude! |
|
© Copyright
2009-2020 by Keith Wood - All rights reserved - Whisky-Emporium /
Whisky-Emporium is not responsible for external website content |
|