Johnnie
Walker
|
|
|
Johnnie
Walker whisky was originally known as
Walker's Kilmarnock whisky and was founded by John 'Johnnie'
Walker who started to sell whisky in his grocery shop.
John
died in 1857 and the business was taken over by his son
Alexander Walker and Grandson Alexander Walker II who both
established this whisky as a popular brand.
Their
own first blend was first produced in 1865 and was called
Walker's Old highland.
1870 Saw
the introduction of the now famous 'square' bottle |
|
|
The
introduction of colour names
occurred between 1906-9 as the range was expanded.
1908
Saw something of a re-branding by the Managing Director
James Stevenson who changed the name from Walker's Kilmarnock
Whiskies to the now iconic "Johnnie Walker" and he also
introduced the slogan "Born 1820 - Still going strong".
He was
also responsible for introducing the "Striding Man" logo.
The
company became part of Distiller's Company in 1925, then
Guinness in 1986 who later merged with Grand Metropolitan to
form Diageo, the current owners.
The
historic Kilmarnock operation was closed in 2010 by Diageo
and
transferred to other facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label,
No
Age Statement,
40% ABV
A blend of up to 35
Single Malt & Single Grain whiskies
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Spiegelau
Colour: Amber
Nose: A touch of malt, a
slight hint of rubber, damp walnut shells and a wet, leafy jetty.
Palate: Initially soft and
creamy with not very much burn following as the flavour of nuts,
straw, malt and hints of honey spread across the palate.
Finish: Long.
Overall
Impression:
A good value, everyday blend, especially this litre I found for
16
|
|
Red Label,
No
Age Statement,
26 2/3 oz,
70°proof
An original JW Red
Label from the early 1960's
Original cost of
this bottle;
(yes, even now)
|
Glass:
Glencairn
Colour:
Bright golden yellow
Nose:
Lightly grassy with a mild nuttiness. Also
toffee and a light smokiness.
Palate:
Very mouth-coating with a dry and smoky
nuttiness, toffee and fudge.
Finish: Long with a dry nuttiness and fudge.
Overall
Impression:
A world of a difference from the JW Red of today. Much richer
and mouth-coating.
|
|
Red Label,
No
Age Statement,
70cl, 40% ABV
An original JW Red
Label from the 1990's
or a little later.
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
9ct yellow gold
Nose:
Offers
leafy vanilla with a hint of banana stem. Over time the
leafiness expands and now includes a definite mustiness.
Palate:
Surprisingly faint but does offer a slight suggestion of
liquorice and peachiness.
Finish:
Surprisingly long and consistant with a creamy peachiness.
Overall
Impression:
An interesting nose gives way to a rather weak and subdued
palate which in turn evolves into a rather long finish. Very
interesting whisky from the 1980's. |
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label,
No
Age Statement
An original
bottling from the 1940's
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Pale bronze
Nose:
Initially very fruity with distinct
suggestions of something quite metallic akin to a foundry or
workshop. After a minute or two the aromas expand to include a
sherry-like property, but very light, perhaps amontillado? Then
the fruitiness returns with hints of bramble (blackberries).
Finally I get a further hint of creme brulιe.
Palate:
Very warming, solid and rich with a
suggestion of that bramble fruitiness and creme brulιe.
Finish: Very long with a slight dryness on the front of the
tongue.
Overall
Impression:
JW Red? Really? Fan-bloody-tastic! |
|
|
|
|
Red Label - 12
different Miniature bottlings
In 2019
/ 2020 I purchased various small collections of miniature
whiskies, one of which was a collection of twelve Johnnie Walker
red label bottlings. Here are my reviews of those bottlings but
sadly I have no information as to exactly when they were
released. |
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No
Age Statement, 43% ABV
Export Bottling
The labels are
similar to the bottling reviewed earler which is from the early
1960's, so I reckon this is also 60's, perhaps early 70's?
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark Oak
Nose:
Initially some very fresh and light notes
fading after some minutes in the glass and being replaced by the
aroma of scorched wood which further intensifies with more time
in the glass, eventually suggesting a burnt woodiness.
Palate:
This has a really tingly or peppery
mouth-feel alongside a fruitiness reminding me of something like
mango or maybe even peach? With time the pepperiness decreases
and that scorched woodiness from the nose appears on the palate.
Finish: Medium to long with that woodiness.
Overall
Impression:
Scorched or burnt woodiness may sound a little unappetising but
it adds a slightly unusual character which I really like here. A
truly lovely and amazing whisky. Is this really JW Red?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No
Age Statement, 40% ABV (Plastic bottle)
Export Bottling for
Schieffelin & Somerset Co. N.Y. In 1987 Moet Hennessey &
Guinness created Schieffelin & Somerset Co. as a joint venture,
then in 1997 Guinness merged with Grand Met to create Diageo.
This may give some idea as to when this one was bottled but as
it doesn't have the Award won in 1996 mentioned on the label I
guess it was pre-'96, but it does state 'blended Scotch Whisky'
as opposed to 'old'.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark Oak with an orange tint.
Nose:
Lots of fruitiness with suggestions of bitter
apple and pear. There's also a dry woodiness, perhaps leafy too
and I'm reminded of banana stem as it certainly does have a
fruity woodiness.
Palate:
This is mouth-filling and big with a peppery
fruitiness.
Finish: Very long, fruity & peppery.
Overall
Impression:
Dry and bitter fruitiness, I like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No
Age Statement, 43% ABV
Export Bottling for
Kupferberg, Mainz (Germany) As far as I can ascertain from
my (google) research on Kupferberg in Mainz, Germany this
bottling is from the 1970's or 1980's, most probably 80's.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Rich dark Oak / Teak.
Nose:
I'm detecting various impressions including
something slightly metallic, cardboard, oat biscuit or even rice
cake / biscuit.
Palate:
Lovely creamy mouth-feel with hints of malty
biscuit and a damp leafiness reminding me of an Autumn country
lane in rural England. It also has a mild pepperiness.
Finish: Long, remaining mouth-filling or coating.
Overall
Impression:
Another different JW Red and a lovely one at that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, No ABV Statement
Duty Free bottling Again I'm suggesting pre-1996 as there's
no mention of the Award won in '96 on the label.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Yellow gold.
Nose:
Similar to the last one as it has some
metallic, malty and oaty cereal hints but this one also has a
fruitiness reminiscent of berries. After about 5 minutes in the
glass some scorched woodiness akin to the first one also
appears.
Palate:
Peppery and fruity but now the fruitiness
suggests mango, papaya or peach. Despite the pepperiness there's
also a lovely creamy mouth-feel.
Finish: Long, very long.
Overall
Impression:
Elements of the first and third bottlings in this series of 12
make it a very good whisky. Quite amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 40% ABV
This edition has
the London 1996 Award printed on the label, so definitely post
1996.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Very pale yellow, straw.
Nose:
Malty biscuit-y-ness alongside a freshness
akin to fresh country air. Even a little grassiness.
Palate:
My initial thoughts are of a watery
mouth-feel. There's also some gentle pepperiness, grassiness and
that biscuit-y-ness from the nose.
Finish: Long and gently peppery.
Overall
Impression:
Watery and lacking some 'oomph'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, No ABV Statement
Again pre-1996
according to the Awards printed on the label. My belief is
1960's or 70's.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Rich dark walnut.
Nose:
Initially I'm thinking of toasted nuttiness,
perhaps burnt walnut shells but this is followed by an
over-riding sense of rubber and sulphur.
Palate:
Intensely rubbery and sulphury. Really quite
unpleasant
Finish: Long, far too long.
Overall
Impression:
Oh dear something went very wrong with this one. Firstly I
thought it could be thanks to some unpleasant sherry notes
causing the rubber and sulphur effects, but as far as I know JW
Red has never been a sherry cask whisky. Something has
definitely gone wrong or 'off' over time as this cannot possibly
be normal. In the end I was left sensing rancid marzipan and
couldn't finish the sample. Such a shame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 40% ABV
Once again no
mention of the 1996 Award but otherwise I don't know the date of
bottling. Somewhere between 1970 to 1990?
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Light Oak
Nose:
Lots of fruitiness, in fact nothing other
than fruitiness with this one. I'm thinking pear, peach or even
kiwi fruit.
Palate:
Very creamy mouth-feel with lots of
fruitiness but also some suggestion of grain (cereal, plain
biscuit?).
Finish: Long.
Overall
Impression:
A little one dimensional but having said this it's a very good
whisky with a big fruity character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 40% ABV
Once again no
mention of the 1996 Award but otherwise I don't know the date of
bottling. Somewhere between 1970 to 1990?
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark yellow gold / light oak.
Nose:
A slightly bitter fruitiness accompanies
aromas of rising bread dough. I'm even reminded of still warm
hot cross buns fresh from the oven.
Palate:
Fruity and mildly peppery with a mustiness.
I'm now thinking more of scones than hot cross buns.
Finish: Long, musty and fruity.
Overall
Impression:
Similar to the last sample with the fruitiness but this also
incorporates some lovely hints of freshly baked scones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 40% ABV
This edition has
the London 1996 Award printed on the label, so definitely post
1996.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark yellow gold but also cloudy.
Nose:
Sulphury like a struck match alongside the
maltiness of malted milk biscuits, albeit quite stale.
Palate:
Hmm, watery, weak, almost tasteless. Another
I'm not going to finish.
Finish: Thankfully very short.
Overall
Impression:
Oh dear, perhaps the cloudiness of the whisky gave me a clue
that something may be wrong. This has also gone off over time
but it isn't quite as unpleasant as my sixth sample, not quite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 43% ABV
Export bottling for
Germany which I'd possibly place as being from the 60's to
the 80's.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Very dark gold or equally dark oak.
Nose:
This sample takes me back to school in the
late 1960's and into the 70's when we had to wear gym shoes
called plimsoles. Yes, that rubbery aroma of plimsoles can never
be forgotten or mistaken.
Palate:
Rubbery with some mild pepperiness.
Finish: Long and rubbery.
Overall
Impression:
OK, so is this another that's deteriorated over time? It's
certainly drinkable if you don't mind some rubberiness (which I
don't mind) and not so unpleasant. Let's say strangely
drinkable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 43% ABV
Export bottling for
Kupferberg (Germany)
As far as I can ascertain from
my (google) research on Kupferberg in Mainz, Germany this
bottling is from the 1970's or 1980's, most probably 80's.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark yellow gold / oak.
Nose:
Very aromatic in a herbal and almost floral
way. There are also suggestions of milky toffee and a gentle
woodiness.
Palate:
There are distinct suggestions of milky
toffee, butterscotch and maybe even brandy snap.
Finish: Medium length continuing with that hint of toffee.
Overall
Impression:
Wonderful, is this the best sample yet? Quite possibly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Label
No Age Statement, 40% ABV
Export bottling for
Kupferberg (Germany)
As far as I can ascertain from
my (google) research on Kupferberg in Mainz, Germany this
bottling is from the 1970's or 1980's, most probably 80's.
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Dark yellow gold.
Nose:
A mixture of aromas including something
faintly herbal alongside bread dough, no make that a warmed and
not too toasted crumpet. There's also the meatiness of bay leaf.
Palate:
Much of the nose translates directly onto the
palate with milky toffee, herbs and a warming meatiness.
Finish: Long, warming, comforting.
Overall
Impression:
Warming, meaty, herbal, lovely.
|
|
|
|
Red Label - The
current (2021) bottling
In order
to finish this series of older JW Reds I decided to purchase the
current edition for comparison. I write this in May 2021 which
is the date of this particular bottling. |
|
|
|
|
Red Label, No age
statement,
40% ABV
Original cost of
this bottle;
(Under 10)
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour:
Yellow gold / pale Oak
Nose:
Somehow a little strange or perhaps difficult
to identify so I tried this whisky on two separate occasions. On
the first I had an initial impression of it being quite farmy
(farmyard, or old farm barn) but alongside this farminess was
what I can only describe as a hint of Brasso. There was also a
hint of something metallic and warm which made me consider a
soldering iron but accompanied by herbal notes. Yes, this
definitely needed a re-sample a few days later.
On my
second try I still found strong herbal suggestions and the hint
of Brasso was still present although more floral in character.
After 4-5 minutes in the glass I found a suggestion of (red)
summer berries.
Palate:
My initial thought here was of a watery
mouth-feel and a mild metallic-ness. It isn't exactly bland but
it is a little weak in flavour.
On my
second try I still found it to be a little watery (40% abv) but
it had much more flavour as the fruitiness (red berries) from
the nose carried forward onto the palate. I still found it to
have a mild metallic suggestion but this was accompanied by a
dry leafiness and a hint of vanilla.
Finish: Surprisingly quite long.
Overall
Impression:
I noticed a definite improvement on my second tasting after the
bottle had been open for almost a week. That exposure to a bit
of air really helps. No, this isn't a spectacular nor great
whisky but it did turn out to be better than I expected and as
for the price of (just under) 10 it has to constitute fantastic
value for money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black Label,
12y,
40% ABV
A blend of over 40
Single Malt & Single Grain whiskies, including Glendullan,
Mortlach, Talisker, Cameron Brig & Black Label
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Spiegelau
Colour: Amber
Nose: A weak nose takes
some time to develop and when it does, it offers the slightest
hint of smoke, overlaid with soft wood, faint herbs and a
mixture of apple and pear.
Palate: I detect a smoky
presence along one side of the tongue, whilst the other half
seems engulfed in fruit. This is also quite gentle and not at
all a harsh whisky.
Finish: Medium to long and gently repetitive.
Overall
Impression:
With all components of this blend a minimum of 12 years it is
definitely a little more mature than the Red Label, but still
great value and a jolly good everyday blend. |
|
|
|
|
|
Black Label,
12y,
43% ABV
An older bottling
of Black Label believed to be from the 1970's
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour: Rich shiny golden
Nose: Light but intense
with a gentle metallic-ness which is quite pleasant. After a few
minutes in the glass I detect a dry leafiness.
Palate: An initial intense
pepperiness is concentrated on the front of the palate followed
by a faint suggestion of oil of orange.
With
4 drops of water: A much smoother mouth-feel and a rich
fruitiness replaces the leafiness.
Finish: Long and concentrated on the front of the palate.
Overall
Impression:
I tried this during an evening of old blends and all present
agreed this was the second best whisky of the evening. It's
unbelievably good. If only this were available to buy today. |
|
|
|
|
|
Double Black,
40% ABV
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Bugatti Kelch
Colour: Oak, light amber
Nose: Initially a little
chemical, light oak, vanilla and slightly maritime. After 3-4
minutes some fruit (peach) appearing, then after a further 3-4
minutes this is replaced by an aroma of freshly dug potatoes.
Palate: There is a very
slight hint of peat, but the emphasis is on very slight
as the main influence here is a mixture of pear and peach.
Finish: Quite long and dry.
Overall
Impression:
When I heard that JW were introducing this Double Black
into certain markets as another peated or smoky offering I
wondered why they should be competing with their own Green
Label, but not to worry, this is hardly peated and far more
chemical. In fact it's a rather strange whisky overall and not a
patch on the wonderrful Green Label. I even prefer the
'normal' black label! |
|
|
|
|
|
Black Label, 12y
Islay Origin,
40% ABV
A blend of Single
Malts from Islay (Caol Ila & Lagavulin)
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour: Oak with a soft
orange tint.
Nose: As I first opened
the bottle my impression was of a smoky whisky with a musty
suggestion of bilge pump. Once the bottle had been open for a
few days the character changed as the mustiness and bilge pump
suggestion disappeared to leave a very nice smoky whisky, very
reminiscent of Caol Ila.
Palate: It does have a
slightly watery mouth-feel probably due to it being 40%. It's
also slightly peppery with lots of sweet smokiness, yes, it's
definitely sweet.
Finish: Medium to long with lots of sweet smokiness.
Overall
Impression:
The longer this bottle stayed open the more I enjoyed the
whisky. It's stated to be a blend of Lagavulin and Caol Ila but
obviously Caol Ila is the predominent component but nothing
wrong with that, it's a jolly good whisky and excellent value
for money. |
|
|
|
|
|
Green Label,
15y,
43% ABV
A blend (Vatting)
of only Single Malt whiskies, including Talisker, Linkwood,
Cragganmore & Caol Ila
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Classic Malt
Colour: Rich gold
Nose: Hints of smoke, peat
and a Scottish jetty on a stormy day in the Atlantic.
Palate: Initially
delightfully smooth and expanding into a smoky, peaty crescendo
right on the front of the tongue.
Finish: Long, but always right on the front middle of the
tongue.
Overall
Impression:
A wonderful JW and also the best value of
them all! |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Label,
18y,
40% ABV
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Nose: I found this a
quite difficult one, but it did offer lots of malt and almost
phenolic bilge pumps.
Palate: Smooth and
gentle with a distinct wateriness. Slight hints of marzipan and
initially quite short, but on the second drink it returns to the
palate and stays a little longer.
Overall Impression:
Pleasant, but hardly memorable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premier,
43% ABV
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass:
Bugatti Kelch
Colour: Rich dark oak
Nose: Freshly polished oak,
wood, marzipan, gentle nut assortment, hints of cognac
Palate: Immediately
intense, rich aromatic honey, red wine, oak, toffee
Finish: Very long, intense and sweet
Overall
Impression:
An excellent whisky, I love it and it's now my favourite JW,
but still a little too expensive at around 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Label,
21y,
40% ABV
Original cost of
this bottle;
|
|
|
Glass: Spiegelau
Colour: Dark honey
Nose: Nuts and slight
phenol.
Palate: Fantastically
smooth with lots of nuts and almond paste.
Overall impression: This
really is good. But the typical price here is around 120 and
I'm sorry, but it's not THAT good. For the same 120 I can get
some great single malts which are much better in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Label,
King
George V,
43% ABV
Contains Cardhu, Lochnagar and some Port Ellen in the mix.
Original cost of
this bottle;
to |
|
|
Glass: Spiegelau
Colour: Gold
Nose:
A tinge of rubber, hints of smoke and eventually some slightly
sweet pear
|
|
|
|
|
Palate: Delightfully
smooth but slow to develop. This really does build slowly, with
some initial pear gradually opening to include walnut, maybe a
little chestnut and eventually a light mango ice cream.
Finish: Once this gets going it is indeed very long and ends
with a tingling spiciness.
Overall impression: How
much! |
|
|
Each
year, Diageo's master blender Jim Beveridge and his team create
a one-off edition of no more than 500 bottles specifically for
the Johnnie Walker Directors. Each edition focuses upon one
element of the whisky making process to highlight the effects of
how individual components, or even processes can influence the
end result. |
|
|
|
|
|
Directors' Blend,
2008
Focus on Grain
One of 450 bottles,
matured in American Oak
Original
cost of this bottle; Internal Ltd Edition, not for resale. |
|
|
Colour:
Light yellow
Nose:
Very fresh and clean with lots of vanilla and
butterscotch.
Palate:
Quite dry and mouth-coating but lots of
grassy butterscotch and just a hint of apricot.
Finish: Medium
|
|
|
|
Overall
Impression:
I can really detect the grain whisky elements in this, so yes, a
focus on grain really works here. Very nice. |
|
|
|
|
Directors' Blend,
2009
Focus on Highland &
Island Smoke
Bottle No.59
Original
cost of this bottle; Internal Ltd Edition, not for resale. |
|
|
Colour:
Rich gold
Nose:
Lots of floral and lightly perfumed smokiness.
Palate:
Creamy, smoky fruitiness with apple,
raspberry and smoke. In fact I'm now thinking stewed apple and
custard.
Finish: Medium to long.
Overall
Impression:
Wonderful, I love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors' Blend,
2010
Focus
on
Speyside Fruit
Original
cost of this bottle; Internal Ltd Edition, not for resale. |
|
|
Colour:
Light gold
Nose:
An immediate burst of what I can only
describe as nicely complex zing. Yes there's fruit, lots of
fruitiness!
Palate:
That fruitiness is joined on the palate by a
delightfully light pepperiness.
Finish: Long with lightly spicy fruit.
Overall
Impression:
Another cracker, maybe even a fruity firecracker!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors' Blend,
2011
Focus
on
Wood
Original
cost of this bottle; Internal Ltd Edition, not for resale. |
|
|
Colour:
Rich golden toffee, maybe even light amber.
Nose:
Apricot and vanilla woodiness alongside
butterscotch.
Palate:
Lots of lightly floral perfume, vanilla and
yes, plenty of oakiness too.
Finish: Long with a delightfully creamy woodiness.
Overall
Impression:
Wow, I'm impressed.
|
|
|
© Copyright
2009-2020 by Keith Wood - All rights reserved - Whisky-Emporium /
Whisky-Emporium is not responsible for external website content |
|